1.
2. That once the hurdle of a false
Invader claim made on Akbar’s behalf is got over, we find that the fort that we
see today in Agra, is the same which was owned by ancient Hindu kings like
Ashok and Kanishka. After Akbar there is no serious claim made on behalf of any
Invader ruler as the author of the fort. That means that the fort that we see
in Agra city today is the ancient Hindu ochre fort a colour so dear to Hindus.
In fact ochre is the colour of Hindu flag- a colour for which and under which
they have fought for their national and cultural existence and identity –a
colour which has inspired them to great deeds of valour, sacrifice, bravery,
chivalry, gallantry and glory. Can that ochre colour be ever owned by Invaders?
It goes against all history and tradition.
3. That despite
several centuries of Invader occupation and canards of Invader authorship all
the fort’s Hindu associations are intact. This is something remarkable. The two thousands year history of the fort
that Keene traces turns out to be authentic. The slight hitch and doubt that he
encounters gets explained away by his own very intelligent footnote that the
incident of a murderer having been flung from the terrace of the palace inside
the fort could not be possible if the fort had been destroyed a year earlier.
The lack of any coherence in the dates of starting the fort construction and
its completion is proof of the fact that the world has been buffed about the
Invader origin of the fort.
4. That Invader accounts are unable
to explain the name of any apartment, as to who built it, when was it built,
what for it was built, what its cost was and why it has an Hindu aura about it?
This is because the fort did not originally belong to the invaders from Arabia,
Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan, Khazasstan, and Uzbekstan. They were mere intruders,
conquerors, and usurpers. All this discussion should convince the reader that
the Red Fort in Agra is of hoary Hindu antiquity and is at least 2200 years
old.
5.
That one
great tragedy of Indian history has been that while Indians remained subdued
and gagged under alien domination for over a millenium foreigners who wielded
all power in India played great havoc with Indian history merrily destroying or
distorting it at will either out of sheer cunning and cussedness or through
their colossal ignorance and wanton barbarism.
6.
That In that process all mediaeval buildings which
came under long Invader occupation came to be misused as tombs or mosques. And
in course of time, thanks to alien chauvinism, court flattery and fanatic
cunning, all ancient Hindu townships and building got ascribed to Invader
authorship. Thus with astounding historical naivete Ahmedabad was, by its sheer
name, assumed to have been founded by Ahmedshah, Tughlaqabad by Tughlaq Shah
and Ferozabad by Ferozshah.
7.
That If one is to be guided by
such puerile logic and shallow historical scholarship then one will have to
conclude that the city of Allahabad in the state of Uttar Pradesh must have
been founded by the Invader God Allah himself. This is with regard to mediaeval
townships. But even for mediaeval buildings the same nonchalant, nondescript
method is followed. Thus it is blatantly stated that if a building is known as
Salimgarh it must have been built by or for Sheikh Salim Chisti (emperor
Akbar’s fancied spiritual preceptor) or Prince Salim (Akbar’s heir apparent)or
some other Salim. Likewise if a building is called Jahangiri Mahal it is, by
that very token insisted that it must have been built by Prince Salim after
ascending the throne as Jahangir. Such superficial derivations and conclusions
about authorship make nonsense of all historical research methodology.
8.
That During nearly 1100 years of
alien rule in India most of her history has been distorted or destroyed. All
massive, majestic and alluring historic Hindu constructions in India, from
Kashmir to Cape Comorin ,have got ascribed to alien Invader invaders such as
Turks, Afghans,Iranians ,Arabs, Abyssinians
and Moguls out of sheer usurpation
or conquest. Such misappropriated constructions include forts, palaces,
mansions, sera’s, roads, bridges, wells, canals and even road- side
mile-pillars. Misuse of a colossal number of Hindu temples, palaces and
mansions as tombs and mosque for several centuries has misled many generations
of the publics, tourists, students and scholars of history all over the world
into believing that those buildings were originally commissioned by the
Invaders.
9.
That
the intelligentsia of Hindusthan has been somewhat slow in assimilating that
finding is a measure of the havoc that history causes in the minds of a subject
people by making it impervious even to logic and legal proof. While
warrior -patriots like Rana Pratap and
the great Chhatrapati Shivaji spill their purple blood to emancipate the land
and its people should it not be the patriotic duty of historians to spill at
least some blue-black ink for an academic re-conquest of occupied buildings
falsely ascribed to alien conquerors?
10.
That there was E. B. Havell, a
great architect, and one endowed with deep insight. Havell has debunked the
claim that the Taj Mahal is the product of any non-Hindu architectural style.
In discussing the architecture of the Taj Mahal and the claim of some
historians that an Italian named Veroneo may have been its designer, Mr. Kanwar
Lal quotes Mr.Havell thus: “So if Veroneo was so deeply versed in Indian craft
tradition that he could design a lotus dome after the rules laid down in the
Shilpa Shastras, the dome itself, built by Asiatic craftsmen would not have
been his. The dome of Taj at Agra and the dome of Ibrahim’s tomb (in Bijapur)
both are constructed on the same principles. They are nearly of the same
dimensions, and a fact unnoticed by Fergusson and his followers, the contours
of both correspond exactly, except that the lotus crown of the Taj at Agra
tapers more finely and the lotus petals at the springing of the dome are inlaid
instead of being sculptured. The Taj Mahal is, infact, exactly such a building
as one would expect to be created in India …by a group of master builders
inheriting the traditions of Buddhist and Hindu buildings. The plan which
consists of a central dome chamber surrounded by four small domed chambers,
follows the plan of an Indian pancharatna, or “five jewelled” temple. Its
prototype as have shown elsewhere is found in the Buddhist temple of Chandi
Sewa in Java and in the sculptured stupa shrines of Ajanta. Neither Shahjahan
nor his court builders, much less an obscure Italian adventurer can claim the
whole merit of its achievements.
11.
That
now as such, Mr.Havell in his assertion is very clear that the Taj Mahal is
built in the ancient Indian, Hindu style and none of Shahjahan’s contemporaries
could design or conceive of it. We regret that Mr. Havell was unaware of the
admission in Shahjahan’s own official chronicle, The Badshahnama, that the Taj
Mahal is an ancient Hindu mansion. Had that confession come to light in his
time he would have rejoiced to find his architectural conclusion fully
corroborated by history, and he would then have been acknowledged as an
authority on Indian architecture far superior to Percy Brown or Fergusson.
12.
That
Like all other so called Invader tombs i.e. Hindu buildings used by them first
as residences and later as burial places the Taj Mahal too is not a single tomb
but an ancient Hindu mansion reduced to an Islamic burial ground. Besides
Mumtaz, Shahjahan himself lies buried by her side. But that is not all. There
are two other graves in the same precincts.
13.
That Mr Kanwar lal (P. 69 The
Taj by Kanwar Lal, ibid.) observes. “At the other end of the Jilokhana, towards
the east there are again two buildings These are the tombs of Satunnisa
(Khanam) who was a favourite attendant of Mumtaz Mahal and who was entrusted
with the task of looking after the temporary tomb of Mumtaz Mahal at Burhanpur.
Similar is the tomb of Sarhandi Begum, another of Shahjahan’s queens. The two
structures are built exactly the alike.”
14.
That the Satunnisa
Khanam’s tomb consists of a high octagonal plinth, round a central octagonal
mortuary chamber. That Taj is based on good authority, but the special
assignment to her of this particular tomb has no better foundation than popular
belief. That shows that like every other detail about the Taj Mahal legend even
the Satunissa Khanam tomb is a concoction. All such tomb like mounds were
erected in usurped Hindu mansions so that Hindus may not reclaim and re use
those buildings. The Invaders knew of the Hindu weakness of not disturbing or
reclaiming sepulchral sites. So, erecting false oblong grave like mounds was like
posting a strong military contingent or planting a scarecrow, which cost
practically nothing. It was a simple device a strategic totem to claim Hindu
buildings for Islam and it worked admirably.
15.
That It is sometimes
innocently asked by history teachers that if the Taj Mahal had existed
centuries before Shahjahan, how is it there are no earlier references to it.
There are three answer to the question. Firstly, the Taj Mahal being then the
palace and not the monument open for public inspection as it now is, used to be
closely guarded. It was accessible only to the elite and then only on
invitation or conquest. As such one cannot except the same prolific references
to it as a tourist attraction that one comes across in these days of publicity
and modern communications. The second answer is that ancient and mediaeval
India teemed with mansions, palaces and temples of bewildering and bewitching
variety, so much so that being all very spectacular, one could not be
distinguished from another by mere description. Despite such very good reasons
for not expecting any identifiable details in earlier records of what is at
present known as Taj Mahal, luckily, Babur, the founder of the Mogul dynasty in
India, who was the great great grandfather of emperor Shahjahan, has left us a
disarming and unmistakable description of the Taj Mahal, if only we have the
inclination and insight to grasp it. So our third answer to the question why no
mention is found in earlier chronicles of the Taj Mahal and other buildings is
that though many a time there is a clear mention of such buildings, our senses
benumbed by traditional tutoring fail to grasp their significance. Such is the
case with the Taj Mahal.
16.
That the rampant corruption
was prevalent during the Mogul time and there were large percentage of
unauthorized profits of innumerable middle men thus there was no money to raise
a cenotaph in the ground floor in octagonal chamber by covering them with
costly mosaic stones to match with the palace flooring and barricading the
hundred of rooms, ventilators staircases, doorways, balconies and corridor.
There exist a seven-storey marble Tejo Mahalaya Hindu temple palace complex.
The seven storey massive girth in its lofty gateways and arches necessitates
the removal of stone pitching and as such Badshahnama discloses the expenditure
incurred in scaffolding of these Hindu complexes and in engraving the Koran on
the walls of edifice. The great French merchant visitor tavernier testimony too
fully corroborates the aforesaid conclusion. Let us examine his testimony
introduce in Maharashtreeya Jnyankosh. “Jean Baptiste Tavernier, a French
jeweler, toured India for trade between 1641 and 1668 A.D. His travel account
is mainly devoted to commerce. He used to sojourn at Surat and Agra (while in
India). He visited all parts of India, including Bengal, Gujrat, Punjab,
Madras, Karnatak, etc. He owned a vehicle .He had to spend Rs. 600 for the cart
and pair of bullocks. ‘The bullocks used to cover 40 miles a day for two months
at a stretch. Four days were enough for the journey from Surat to Agra or
Golcunda and the expense used to be between Rs. 40 and Rs.50. The roads were as
good as Roman highways. European traveler’s felt inconvenienced in Hindu
territories for want of meat, which was freely available in Invader dominions.
A good postal system was in vogue. Both the town –folk and the government used
to provide protection against highway robbery’…is the kind of information
Travernier has recorded (in his book titled Travels in India). Not being
learned, he has not recorded much except where wealth and commerce was
concerned.
17.
That the other important piece
of evidence arises from some chance digging conducted in the Garden in front of
the marble edifice early in the year 1973 A.D. It so happened that the
fountains developed some defect .It was therefore thought advisable to inspect
the main pipe that lay imbedded underneath. When the ground was dug to that
level some hollows were noticed going down to another five feet. Therefore the
ground was dug to that depth. And to the utter surprise of all there lay at
that depth another set of fountains hitherto unknown. What appeared more
significant was that those fountains are aligned to the Taj Mahal, decisively
indicating that the present building existed even before Shahjahan. Those
hidden fountains could have been installed neither by Shahjahan not his
successors, the British. Therefore they were of the pre-Shahjahan era. Since
they were aligned to the Taj Mahal building it followed ipso facto that the
building too pre-dated Shahjahan. This piece of evidence too therefore clinches
the issue in favour of our conclusion that Shahjahan only commandeered an
ancient Hindu temple –palace for Mumtaz’s burial.
18.
That the archaeology officer, who
supervised that digging, was Mr. R. S. Verma, a conservation assistant, who made another chance discovery. Once while
strolling staff-in-hand on the terrace near the so-called mosque and the
circular well on the western flank of the marble edifice, Mr. Verma detected a hollow sound coming from
below the floor where his staff hit the terrace. He had a slab covering that
spot removed and to his surprise that was an ancient opening, apparently sealed
by Shahjahan, to a flight of about 50 steps reaching down into a dark corridor.
The broad wall under the terrace was apparently hollow. From this it is clear
that the corresponding spot on the eastern terrace also hides a similar
staircase and corridor, at its bottom. And God only knows how many more such
walls, apartments and stories lie sealed, hidden and unknown to the world. Thus
also incidentally points to the sorry state of research with respect to the Taj
Mahal. Nobody seems to have done neither any archaeological investigation in
the grounds of the Taj Mahal nor conducted a diligent academic study of the
whole issue. Apparently extraneous political and communal considerations have
inhibited historians and archeologists from conducting any meaningful research
into the origin of Taj Mahal. Such Academic cowardice is highly
reprehensible.
19.
That Naturally when chance alien
visitors like Peter Mundy visit such sites undergoing extensive superficial
changes his observing that “the building is begun…. …( and ) is prosecuted with
extraordinary diligence “ is not wrong .He couldn’t visualise that some
generations after him posterity would be bluffed into believing that the Taj
Mahal complex was raised by Shahjahan
himself .Travernier and Peter Mundy could not possibly visualize such a
falsification of history and could not be more explicit. We ourselves visiting
some building as chance visitors wouldn’t be more explicit. For instance if we
were to visit Bombay or London at a time when somebody has acquired somebody
else’s mansion and has enclosed it in massive scaffolding to renovate it for
his own purpose we won’t dare or care to ask him how he acquired the building,
for how much, from whom, what changes he proposed to make, and spend how much over
it .We would simply refer to it as his building. Such inquiries are all the
more impossible when a wide hiatus of language, race, culture authority, and
wealth separates the two. Peter Mundy also fortunately records the object of
the leveling up of the hillocks. The hillocks were removed, he says, ”because
they might not hinder the prospect “ of the mausoleum .The very fact that
within a couple of years of Mumtaz’s death the hillocks were leveled to afford
a glimpse of the mausoleum clearly indicates that the Taj building complex
already existed .All that was necessary was to level some of the hillocks and
make the building visible from a distance. In fact the very object of the
ancient Hindu builders of the Taj raising those hillocks seems from Mundy’s noting,
to prevent the tempting Taj to be the target of a malicious enemy’s attack.
Since Shahjahan was converting it into a tomb open to all and sundry, he no
longer had the need to keep it out of the gaze of enmical people.
20.
That Waldemar Hansen notes on
pages 181-182 of his book (titled “The Peacock Throne”, published by Holt,
Rhinehart and Winston) that “Even as early as 1632 on the first anniversary of
Mumtaz Mahal’s death, the courtyard of the mausoleum in progress had been
adorned with superb tents, with the entire court assembled to pay homage-
princes of the royal blood, grandees and an assemblage of religious scholars
including sheikhs, ulemas and hafizes who knew the whole Koran by heart.
Shahjahan had graced the event with his presence, and as the empress’s father
Asaf Khan was present by imperial request, a great banquet was spread before
the then nascent tomb and guests partook of a variety of foods, sweetmeats, and
fruits. Verses from the Koran filled the air, prayers were offered for the soul
of the dead and a hundred thousand rupees went into charity. In later years on
other anniversary days, Shahjahan attended memorials at the incomplete edifice
whenever in Agra, formally accompanied by Jahanara and the harem .The ladies
always occupied a central platform set up for the occasion, and remained
concealed from the public gaze by kanats, screens of red cloth and velvet.
Noblemen gathered under pitched tents.
21.
That the Taj Mahal originated
as a temple -The inscription in Sanskrit has 34 stanzas of which stanzas 25,26
and 34 being relevant to our topic are reproduced as translation. Translated,
these means:”He (King Parmardi Dev or on his behalf his minister Salakshan)
raised a palace which had inside it the idol of Lord Vishnu whose feet the king
used to touch with his (bowed) head.
22.
That “Similarly the King also had
constructed this temple,(dedicated) to the God who bears the crescent on His
(fore)head, made of crystal white stone. Consecrated in that (magnificent)
temple the lord (was so pleased that He) never thought of repairing to His
(Himalayan) abode on mount Kailas. The inscription found at Mauja Bateshwar,
near Agra is at present in the Lucknow Museum.It is of the King Paramardi Dev
dated Vikram Samvat 1212, Ashwin (month),5th day of the bright lunar
fortnight. It has in all 34 stanzas which describe the origin of the
Chandratreya (regal) dynasty and its important rulers. The inscription was
found embedded in a mound at Bateshwar .It was later deposited in the Lucknow
Museum by General Cunnigham, where it still is. The two beautiful marble
temples which King Paramardi Dev had raised, one for Lord Vishnu and the other
for Lord Shiva were subsequently desecrated during Invader invasions. Some
clever (farsighted) person has this inscription ,concerning these
temples,buried in a mound. It remained buried for many years until1900 A.D.
when during excavations it was discovered by General Cunnigham. The Shiva
(Chandramauleeshwar) temple is obviuosly the Taj Mahal for the following
reasons:
Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters
of the Koran.
23.
That the age of the original stone of
the Taj Mahal and the age of the Koran scrawled-stone are certainly different
and which could be ascertain scientifically. No where is there even the
slightest or remotest elusion in that Islamic overwriting stating Shahjahan’s
authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder of Taj Mahal, naturally
some words would have been scrawled there. When koranic lettering has been
forged on the walls of Taj Mahal, then why not the name of Mumtaz in whose
memory it was stated to be built.
24.
That it is mentioned by the
inscriber, Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription on the building that
Shahjahan, far from building the marvel Tej, only disfigured it with black
lettering. A clue to that tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217,
Vol. IV of Archaeological Survey of India Reports, published in 1874, stating
that a .“great square black basaltic pillar which, with the base and capital of
another similar………..now in the grounds of the Museum at Agra……………….it is well
known, one stood in the garden of Taj Mahal.” The true copy of the photographs
deplicting the different monument with tempered representation having deceptive
indintity proclaiming as Mughal constriction as exhibited in the photographs
are Annexure no.18
25.
That there was also a Sanskrit
inscription dated 1155 A. D. in the Taj Mahal which speaks conclusively that it
was a Hindu Temple, which was subsequently wrongly termed as Bateshwar
inscription, now preserved at the top floor of the Lucknow Museum.
26.
That despite such staggering
evidence the respondent authorities have been guilty of Tomin the Taj Mahal as
a marble creation of Shahjahan and thereby creating and misleading the world
for over a century. All of them have also been making illegal gains through
their deceitful activities by being paid huge sums for their books, articles,
news reports, broadcasts, and telecasts.
27.
That Archaeological Survey of
India is guilty of charging high entrance fee from thousands of visitors every
day from all over the world for over a century purveying through its licensed
guides concocted details about Shahjahan’s take authorship of the Taj Mahal and
through Archaeological Survey of India notices in Hindi, Urdu and English on
three stone plaques displayed at the Tajmahal entrance declaring that Shahjahan
raised the monument from 1631 to 1653 A. D.
28.
That the authorities are guilty
of giving mis-information and dis-information all over the world for over a
century. The enormity of that academic crime affecting the whole world has
caused a deep injury and prejudice to the human population of the world. The
national motto of our country is “Satyameva Jayate“ (Truth alone triumphs).
That In that context the blatant lie that the Archaeological Survey of India
has been propagating to the entire academic and tourist world is a matter of
national sham and a serious concern to all.
29.
That there is no valid reason why
Anglo-Invader school should not be able to produce even a single document
pertaining to the Invader claims to the fort. Had the claims been true such
documents should have been available in plenty because when the British deposed
the Mogul emperor they preserved and carefully classified all the documents
they seized form the mogul archives. Those records contain hardly anything but
letters. That when the Anglo-Invader school is unable to produce even a single
document in support of its claim any law court would draw an a priori adverse
inference.
30.
That even then we claim no special
advantage form this fundamental weakness in the case of the respondent
Anglo-Invader school. In ordinary life, there are very many occasions when
documents are not available on either side and yet there is overwhelming
circumstantial evidence on the basis of which the court can come to a clear
judgement over the rival claims. It is such circumstantial evidence which we
propose to lay before the bar and bench of learned public opinion:
31.
That according to the British historian
Keene, Agra fort has been in existence from the pre-Christian era. Ancient
Hindu kings like Ashok (3rd Century B.C.) and Kanishka (1st
Century B.C.) had lived in that fort. That same fort is again referred to by
the Persian poet-historian Salman, in the 11th century A.D.. Early
in that century when the Hindu king Jaipal ruled over Agra. The fort suffered
its first Invader raid under the invader Mahmud of Ghazni.Thereafter some
chauvinistic Islamic accounts vaguely claim that the Invader sultan Sikandar
Lodi demolished the Hindu fort. That claim has been found to be baseless. A few
years later another vague claim is made by some other mediaeval Invader
faltterers that sultan Salim Shah Sur either destroyed the Hindu fort or
Sikandar Lodi’s fort and built his own fort at exactly the same place or some
other place. Even the claim has been found to be fraudulent because no trace is
found of the fort that Salim Shah Suri is said to have built. Invader history
is replete with such fraudulent claims, according to the late British historian
Sir H.M. Elliot.
32.
That an English visitor, Peter Mundy
who was in India only for about a year after Mumtaz’s death mentions the Taj
Mahal as one of the most spectacular buildings. Thus Shahjahan’s sacrilege of
the Hindu Taj temple-palace by misusing it as an Islamic graveyard ought to be
rectified by removing Arjumand Banu’s remains,if they really are in the Taj
Mahal, to her original grave, still
existing in Burhanpur. The garden pavilion of an Hindu mansion in
Burhanpur (about 600 miles south west of Agra) where Mumtaz was buried in 1631
A.D. after her death in her 14th delivery during 18 years of married
life. Shahjahan Mumtaz had encamped in the adjoining Hindu palace during a
north south journey when Mumtaz died.
33.
That
the ground plan of the orthodox Vedic octagonal Tejomahalaya shrine in Agra
where Mumtaz’s exhumed body is supposed to have been interred again. Why this
sacrilege? An aerial view. The white marble Tejomahalaya framed by four towers
at its plinth-corners on the south bank of the sacred Yamuna river. Two
identical red stone buildings (each with three marble domes) facing the marble
edifice from the east and west were meant to be reception pavilions for royal
or religious congregations. The central marble building and the flanking red
stone buildings are all seven storied with octagonal features, which is a Vedic
specialty. Seven storied octagonal buildings are mentioned even in Ramayanic
description of Ayodhya. A meticulous count will reveal 33 arches in the marble
plinth seen in front in between the two towers on the left and the right. Since
the marble platform is a square the breadth too has 33 arches consequently the
marble plinth itself encloses 33x 33=1089 rooms That is the ground floor. Above
it on either side of the lofty entrance arch may be seen vaulted arches on two
levels one above the other, which constitutes two more stories in marble.
34.
That
the outer western gateway leading to the spacious parking area for visitors’
vehicles lined by arcaded red stone verandahs with rooms for shopkeepers
selling their wares. The entire parking area is lined by such shopping arcades
which Tavernier describes as bazar of six courts. The western gateway has
assumed importance in modern times because the main bus depot and railway
stations of the populace, bustling Agra city lies in that direction. In olden
days it was the elevated gateway at the left which used, to be the main
entrance of the Tajganj alias Tajganj township. The Tejomahalaya shopping
arcade has had at its outer eastern and western corners, flanking the Shree
gate, two other subsidiary sentinel-temples. This octagonal pavilion with a
white dome in the southwest corner bearing the inverted lotus cap and straight
Vedic pinnacle pitcher shaft is one of them. But alas, since Shahjahan’s time
the sacred sanctum has an Islamic cenotaph attributed to an harem-maid
Satunnisa Khanam. But since no name is inscribed on it that seems to be an
inspired canard explaining away the desecration of the Hindu shrine.
35.
That the interior of the multi-storied
vaulted entrance gate leading first to the rectangular garden and then to the
wonder marble edifice at the far end. The temple palace management staff used
to work on both floors on various assigned duties. The carved decorative red
stone bunting around the interior and exterior of this gateway, about knee-high
from the floor, if minutely observed turns out to be an ingenious running chain
of three-in-one Ganesh images, two in profile on the flanks and one with a
frontal facing in the middle. The marble Taj Mahal has identical vaulted lofty
archways in all the four directions. Their temple décor was chiseled away and
Koranic extracts were improvised to fill the cavities. Close look at the marble
stone frames around the vertical and horizontal Koranic passages to notice the
patches of dissimilar shapes and tints of marble used. Cobras lined up above a
string of inlaid temple bells pattern form the upper border of the Taj Mahal.
Both cobras and bells have sacred associations in Vedic spiritual lore.
36.
That the gateway at which entry tickets are
issued, is decorated both inside and out, at the knee level with a bunting
depicting such ingeneous three-in-one Ganesh caricatures; two in profile on the
flanks enclosing a frontal one in the middle. The arches in the marble plinth
and the rectangular ventilator above each one of them,(allowing light and air to
the 1089 chambers inside the plinth)may be minutely observed to have been
sealed with marble slabs.
37.
That the seven arches at the bottom enclose
the stairs, which lead to the top of the marble plinth symmetrically from the
right and left. The Nandi (Lord Shiva ‘s Bull) occupied the spot where the
person clad in white robes is seen standing facing the entrance, before it was
uprooted at Shahjahan’s orders. That spot was patched up later with inferior
reddish slabs. There is trident shaped designs in inlay filigree at the two
upper corners of the entrance and the trident shaped red lotus bud at the apex
of the arch.
38.
That the Koranic stones fixed vertically and
horizontally along such lofty arches on all four sides were improvised to fill
up gaping cavities left after digging out idols of Vedic deities and Sanskrit
extracts. We arrive at the above conclusion because (1) a close inspection of
the marble frames enclosing the Koranic extracts reveal patches of marble of
different shapes and tints (2) The Koranic extracts are random, haphazard out
of sequence and incomplete (3) On hot days with the visitor’s feet burning on
the marble plinth a fierce sun beating down on the head and the eyes burning
with intense sunlight radiated by the white marble sheen even a devout Invader
knowing Arabic won’t have the heart or even the steady head or patience to
crane and strain his eyes and neck alternately vertically and horizontally to
make any head or tail of that message of Allah. A close-up of the upper part of
a minaret. The galleries rest on snake-shape brackets, which is a distinct
Hindu architectural trait. Mumtaz’s tomb in the crypt (basement). The pavement
patched up with marble slabs of varying sizes and tints indicating that the
Shivling here has either been replaced by the cenotaph or is covered up by it.
39.
That after one enters the lofty arch from
the marble platform one-steps onto spacious halls which form a perambulatory
passage all around the central octagonal sanctum. That sanctum too has
entrances on all four sides. But only the south entrance has been kept open
since Shahjahan’s time. All these outer and inner entrances had silver doors,
which are common to all renowned Hindu (Vedic) shrines. Those were uprooted and
ranged on the outer marble plinth before being spirited away to Shahjahan’s
Mogul treasury. European visitors to the shrine around 1631 A.D. noticing the
uprooted costly fixtures such as silver doors ranged on the marble platform
misunderstood them to have been ordered by Shahjahan to be used in the
building. Contrarily the thousands of labourers rounded up from the by lanes of
Agra city under threats of dire consequences were forced to toil gratis to
uproot all the costly fixtures such as the gem studded gold railings (around
the Shivaling), silver doors, precious stones stuffed in the marble lattices
and the golden pitcher dripping water on the Shivlinga, and transport them to
the mogul treasury. Notice the framed decorative panels to the left and right
of the doorway. They depict embossed OM
shaped Dhatura flowers and conchshell- type foliage. The panel at the left has
the sacred conchshell design. The right side panel depicts a plant with flowers
shaped like the sacred Vedic chant (OM).
40.
That Mumtaz’s cenotaph in the foreground
and subsequent Shahjahan’s cenotaph besides it in the upper marble octagonal
chamber. Notice that both the cenotaphs are highly decorated with inlay work.
Science have been so somnolent for the last 350 and odd years as to allow the
preposterous Shahjahan and Mumtaz legend, stained with carnal love to pass muster in spite of being riddled with
a myriad loopholes disclosed .Around the hook
(from which hangs the chain) is a sketch in concentric circles. In the
smallest innermost circle are arrows symbolizing the eight surface directions.
Around it is another circle of 16 serpents looking down on the Shivling
underneath. Around it is a wider circle of 32 tridents. Surrounding it is a
bigger circle depicting 64 lotus buds. Even this mathematical progression of
multiples of 8 i.e. 8x2=16x2=32x2=64 is of esoteric Vedic significance and has
no relation with Islam.The preponderating significance of 8 in Vedic tradition
may be judged from terms such as Ashtapailu, Ashtavadhani, Ashtaputra,
Ashtadhatu, Ashtang Ayurved, Mangalashtak and Sastang namaskar.
41.
That the octagonal lattice around the
cenotaph of Mumtaz (which has replaced or covered the sacred Shivling) has in
its upper border a total of 108 pitchers, some rotund and striped and some
oblong like vases. The rotund striped pitcher is seen bathing the Shivaling
underneath with a stream of milk. The decorative flora on the vase and other
parts of the Taj Mahal alias Tejomahalaya is all native to India. Such
decoration in the orange, Vedic colour behooves a Hindu temple or palace but
never a somber Islamic sepulchre.
42.
That a close-up of the gilded pinnacle
rising from the inverted lotus cap of the marble dome .The pinnacle is known as
Kalash in Vedic parlance because of the stack of pitchers which constitute it.
The curvy shaft seen in the upper portion represents the crescent on Lord
Shiva’s forehead. Above it is an oblong pitcher, two mango leaves curving on
either side with a coconut balanced on top. Such a coconut –topped pitcher
represents divinity in Vedic tradition.
43.
That the three domes of the so-called
mosque are a misfit in Islam. Since Islam has only one Allah and one prophet
for who is the third dome? Moreover the qibla (i.e. the prayer niche) is not
aligned to the Kaba in Mecca, as it should be in a genuine mosque. Also when
there are three qiblas instead of one they couldn’t all be aligned to the Kaba
at the same time. And since the twin buildings on the eastern flank is a
non-mosque it automatically follows that its counterpart to the west is also a
non-mosque. Only buildings with the same function and purpose can have an
identical design.
44.
That there is staircase and another
symmetrical one at the other end lead down to the storey beneath the marble
platform Tow such staircases (one each at the eastern and western ends) behind
the marble plinth take one to the nether chambers. Visitors may go to the back
of the marble plinth at the eastern or western end and descend down the
staircase because it is open to sky. But at the foot the archaeology department
has set up an iron grill door, which it keeps, locked. Yet one may peep inside
from the iron grill in the upper part of the door. Shahjahan had sealed even
these two staircases. It was the British who opened them. But from Shahjahan’s
time the stories below and above the marble ground floor have been barred to
visitors. We are still following Mogul dictates and Invader secrecy though long
free from Mogul Islamic rule.
45.
That One of the 22 locked rooms in the
secret storey beneath the marble platform of the Taj Mahal, which the
archaeological Survey of India keeps conspiratorially locked to hoodwink the
public. Therefore the public must pressurized the government to open all locked
and sealed chambers in all monuments including the Taj.
46.
That the strips of ancient Hindu paint are
seen on the wall flanking the doorway. The niches above had paintings of Hindu
gods, obviously rubbed off by Invader desecrators. One of the 22 riverside
rooms in a secret storey of the Taj Mahal unknown to the public. Shahjahan far
from building the shining marble Taj wantonly disfigured it. Here he has
crudely walled up a doorway. Such imperial Mogul vandalism lies hidden from the
public. This room is in the red stone storey immediately below the marble platform.
Indian history has been turned topsy- in lauding destroyers as great builders.
Therefore Shahjahan should be referred to not as the creator of Taj but as a
plunderer of its costly fixtures and disfigurer of the sublime, serene beauty
of the holy Tejomahalaya.
47.
That many such doorways of
chambers in secret stories underneath the Taj Mahal have been sealed with brick
and lime. Concealed inside could be valuable evidence such as Sanskrit
inscriptions, Hindu idols, the original Hindu model of Taj, the desecrated
Shiva Linga, Hindu scriptures and temple equipment .The Government is
deliberately refraining from opening hundreds of such sealed chambers. Inside
the Taj Mahal for fear of enraging Invaders and exposing the incompetence of
historians worldwide.
48.
That there was the traditional
treasury well of the Hindu temple palace. Treasure chests used to be stacked in
the lower stories. Accountants, cashiers, and treasurers sat in the upper
stories. On being besieged if the building had to be surrendered to the enemy
the treasure chests used to be pushed into the water for salvage later after
recapture. For real research, water should be pumped out of this well to reveal
the evidence that lies at the bottom. This well is inside a tower near the
socalled mosque to the west of the marble Taj. Had the Taj been a mausoleum
this octagonal multi storied well would have been superfluous.
49.
That it has come to the notice
of the petitioner’s institute that there has been the digging of the place
where “gowshala” cow protection shelter was situated .It was revealed that
there are the remains of the temple dig inside the earth and the upper portion
of the temple called as “Amlak” was found to have been hidden inside there. The
official sought the instructions from the officials of the archaeological
department but the matter was subsided on the instructions of the authority as
it may annoy the fundamentalist as a result of which the appeasement policy
adopted by the government for getting the vote of the minority may be adversely
affected. Thus the spot inspections by appointing the team of survey
commissioner to submit Its report may kindly be ordered by this Hon’ble Court
50.
That Visitors to the Taj may notice the
letter “om” woven in bold relief in embossed
flower –designs on the interior marble walls. As one stands poised at the top
of the stairs leading to the basement (to se what they call the ‘real graves’)
one may see on the walls around the upper marble cenotaph chamber, at chest
level, the esoteric sacred Hindu letter ‘om’ woven into embossed marble
flower pattern. Pink lotus patterns on the border of the grilled panels that
enclose the cenotaph may also be noticed.
51.
That a peacock Throne could never have
been ordered by fanatic mediaeval Invader rulers surrounded by even more
fanatic maulvis. Throughout their millennium long rule in India their one
penchant was to break images not to make them. The peacock Throne could only be
a piece of Hindu Palace furniture because traditionally a Hindu throne must
have the effigy of some bird or animal known for its splendor or valour. In
Hindu terminology the very term for a throne is a “Lion Seat (Simhasan).”Hardly
had the project begun, than we are told that by 1635 Shahjahan had amassed such
a plethora of gems and bullion, within seven years of his accession that he did
not know what to do with them. He therefore had a fabulous Peacock Throne
ordered.
52.
That According to Shahjahan’s court
chronicler (PP. 45-46,ibid.), it appears that the peacock Throne was “three
yards long, two and a half yards broad, yards high and set with jewels worth 86
lakh rupees. The canopy had 12 emerald columns. On top of each pillar were two
peacocks thick –set with rubies, diamonds, emeralds, and pearls. The throne
cost ten million Rupees.” “The marble screen enclosing an octagonal area in the
centre of the cenotaph chamber was, according to the Badshahnama placed here in
1642 by Shahjahan …According, however, to competent authority the screen was
placed here by Aurangzeb after he laid his father’s remains there.
53.
That “The basement rooms are
centrally situated as a line of 14 rooms along the face of the Great Basement,
under its terrace; and each of them is connected by a doorway with as inner
lobby running east and west along their entire length. From each end of the
lobby a staircase ascends to the terrace of the Great Basement, where its
entrance closed by red sandstone slabs, lay unsuspected until discovered a few
years ago, the clue being given by a small window overlooking the river in each
of the two easternmost rooms. The rooms, once frescoed and otherwise decorated
being now in darkness and infested by bats, cannot be explored without a torch
or lamp. Whether they originally opened on to a ghat and gave admittance to the
Taj from the river; or being provided with windows, were used as cool resorts
during the heat of the day, cannot now be decided”.
54.
That in the Agra Fort gallery, facing
the Taj, is a tiny glass piece embedded in the wall to mirror the Taj Mahal.
Originators of the Taj legend have conveniently annexed the device to add to
the mesmeric effect of the myth. Embedding tiny, round glass reflectors by
their thousands in arched recesses of palaces and in women’s dresses is a very
common and widespread Rajput practice. Such glass reflectors can still be seen
fixed in numerous ancient palaces in Rajasthan, and continue to be used for
decoration in Rajput women’s dresses. Saracenic architecture, if there be any such
should rather believe in “purdah “ i.e. shrouding or hiding and would never
think of glass reflectors. Mirror –pieces decorated the royal apartments in
Agra fort because it was a Hindu fort. Moreover Shahjahan was never permitted
access during interment to that part of the fort which overlooks the Taj. It
is, therefore absurd to argue that during detention he consoled himself by
catching glimpses of the Taj in the tiny glass piece.
55.
That a further absurdity and
inconsistency is; would an old monarch, bent with age, stand up all the time to
strain his bedimmed vision, and peer into a tiny glass piece with his back to
the Taj to catch a fleeting, reflected glimpse of the Taj when he could as well
have a clear, full, straight and direct view of it seated comfortably facing
the monument? And would not such a stance give him a pain in the neck? This is
yet another instance of how students of history, archaeologists and lay
visitors have never bothered or cared to take stock of the loose bits of the Taj
legend, and tried to rearrange them to find out whether they add up to at least
a coherent and cogent account, even if fictitious.
56.
That in addition to its sculptural
splendor, the Taj is also believed to have had gem studded marble screens, gold
railing, and silver doors. Readers can well add up to the cost of all these. It
will amount to a fabulous, astronomical sum. Perhaps even all the Mogul
emperors together could not have invested that much on a single monument. Had the Taj been an original tomb, Shahjahan
would never have allowed Indian flora to form the dominant feature of the
tapestry design inside the mausoleum of his wife. It is idle to argue that
because the workmen employed on the Taj happened to be Hindus their motifs got
incorporated in the Taj design. It must be remembered that it is the person who
pays the piper that calls the tune. Moreover when it is a question of the peace
of departed soul, symbols and motifs of a detested religion would never have
been allowed to be incorporated in the ornamental patterns of the Taj. In fact
the whole idea of having such a luxurious tomb built and having decorative
patterns made inside it is frowned upon in Islamic religion and tradition. But
Shahjahan had no alternative, but to put up with them, since he had taken over
a ready-made “heathen” monument.
57.
That under these circumstances, it
is expedient in the interest of justice that a facts finding committee may be
appointed for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department in respect
of their purported claim set-up regarding the historical blunder committed by
them in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other ancient
buildings as Muslim monuments and truth may be disclose to the public/citizens
and students of subject of history regarding their true authorship prior to
Mughal period in furtherance of their
fundamental rights conferred under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with 49
and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
58.
That it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court
May graciously be pleased to declare the provisions of The Ancient And
Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of
National Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the ancient and
historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal.
Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford, Ethmadualla and other Monuments built by Mugal
invaders on the basis of report submitted by The Governor General, Lord
Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme
of misusing the archaeological studies as ultravires to Article 19 (1) (a),
25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h) of constitution of India and may futher declare the
provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and
Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The
Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 of declaring these ancient building/ monuments
preserved with such identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as
Muslim monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void. The true copy of
THE ANCIENT MONUMENTS PRESERVATION ACT, 1904, The Ancient And Historical
Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National
Importance) Act, 1951 and
The Ancient Monuments And
Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 ( Act No.24 of !958) and other
relevant Acts are filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.
19, 20 and 21
59.
That it is further prayed that on the
basis of the Research Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the
different books written by him as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1.
World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of
Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6.
Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building,
8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva
Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty,
Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN
2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the
truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the
General Citizen/ Students of history by conducting the research/ excavations of
the remains of Hindu monuments by the Central Government surroundings to all
such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments
as the incidents like demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be
repeated resulting in mass destruction of the public property shacking of
public confidence in Rule Of Law in the society. The true copy of the
representation submitted to the respondent No. 1 on the basis of the reserch
work conducted by Sri P. N. Oak having legal interpretation to the legal right
conffered to the citizen having scientific and analytcial approach regarding
Hindu authorship of monuments is filed as Annexure
No. 22
60.
That it is further prayed that A writ ,
order, directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry
report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India to
Declare and Notify in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built
by Shahalahan and thereby directing the Archaeological Survey of India to
remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting
Shahjahan as its creator to desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming /
propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop
and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays or any other
day in the week.
61.
That it is further prayed that a
writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India to open the locked-up
upper and lower portions of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal with numbers
of rooms, to remove all bricked up walls build later and look into room
therein, to investigate scientifically and certify which of those or both
cenotaphs are fake to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground
level, to look into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the
basement cenotaph-chamber. by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking
the doorway, to look for important historical evidence such as idols and
inscriptions hidden inside the Shahjahan’s orders.Recitiation of name in the
west-flank building be banned because that building is part of a temple
complex.The water in the 7 storeyed well, inside the tower near the so-called
mosque, be drained to for drained to look for historical evidence (such as
Court jewels idols and inscription jettisoned when Shahjahan’s troops stormed
the premises to plunder the Shiv Shrine).Free entry on Fridays should be
discontinued to prevent loss of revenue to the Government .If free entry on
Friday is allowed to continue then free entry on Mondays should be ordered
because Mondays are Shiv worship days.
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 36818 of 2004
(Under Article
226 of constitution of India)
(District –
Agra)
Institute of Rewriting Indian History
Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
Aundh, Pune – 411007 and another
VERSUS
Union of India through Secretary,
Human
Resources and Development (HRD.),
Government
of India, New Delhi. And others
…………...Respondents
62.
63.
That
the petitioners has no other efficacious remedy , expect to file the present
Writ Petition on the following and other grounds:-
Grounds
A.
Because truth will not make us rich, but it will
certainly make us free. The wrong historical data leads to the horror, as we
have seen during the period of demolition of the Babri Masjid. There has been
number of concomitant given by the respective community representing to the
follower of two prominent religions, but the loss that we have suffered in the
shape of hatred between the two section of the society, cannot be compensated
without revealing the truth. Unfortunately, the term Hindu communalism is more
exaggerated by the fanaticism under the garb of secularism, while the Hindu
community as a whole has always been receptive to all the religion.
B.
Because Article 25 of the constitution in India
secures to every person, subject of course to public order, health and morality
and other provisions of Part III, including Article 17 freedom to entertain and
exhibit outward acts as well as propagate and disseminate such religious belief
according to his judgement and conscience for edification of others. The right
of the State to impose such restrictions as are desired or found necessary on
grounds of public order, health, and morality is inbuilt in Arts. 25 and 26
itself. Article 25(2)(b) ensures the right of the State to make a law providing
for social welfare and reforms besides throwing open of Hindu religious
institutions of a public character to classes and sections of Hindus and any
such rights of State or of the communities or classes of the society were also
considered to need due regulation in the process of harmonizing the various
rights.
C.
Because every citizen of India is fundamentally
obligated to develop a scientific temper and humanism .He is fundamentally duty
bound to strive towards excellence, in all sphere of individual and collective
activity, so that the nation constantly rises to the higher level of endeavor
and achievements. Everyone, whether individually or collectively is
unquestionably under the supremacy of law. However it is true that exaggerated
devotion to the rule of benefit must not nurture fanciful doubts or lingering
suspicion and thereby destroy social defense, as the curiosity cannot be the
subject matter of fair criticism. Thus the conclusion derived that on one hand,
every citizen is having the freedom of speech and expression so far as they do
not contravene the statutory limits and may prevail in the atmosphere with out
any hindrance.
D.
Because public education is essential for
functioning of the process of popular government and to assist the discovery of
truth and strengthening the capacity of individual in participating in decision
making process .The decision making process include the right to know also and
pushing the protection beyond the primary level betrays the bigwigs desire to
keep the crippled more crippled forever. The education of spritualism is the
foundation for value based survival of human being in a civilized society. The
force and section behind civilized society depend upon moral value; and the
morality cannot be cultivated through the falsehood of ideological barrier.
Thus the children may not be required to read such facts, which are having the
foundation of falsehood.
E.
Because in Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of
Kerala (1986) 3 SCC 615, the question
raised in the aforesaid case, as to whether three children who were faithful to
“Jehovah’s witnesses” may refuse to sing our national anthem or salute the
national flag of our country despite being the student in the school, where
during morning assembly, the national anthem is sung by other children. The
circular issued by the Director of Public Instruction, Kerala provided
obligation of school children to sing the National Anthem. Thus these children
were expelled. The Hon’ble Supreme court while setting aside the aforesaid
order of expulsion of the children from the school was pleased to examine, as
to whether the children faithful to “Jehovah’s witnesses”, a worldwide sect of
Christianity may be compelled against tenets of their religious faith duly
recognized and well established all over the world which was upheld by the
highest court in United States of America, Australia and Canada and find
recognition in Encyclopedia Britannica. It was held that the appellants truly
and conscientiously believed that their religion does not permit them to join
any rituals except it them in their prayers to Jehovah, their God. Though their
religious beliefs may appear strange, the sincerity of their beliefs is beyond
question. They do not hold their beliefs idly and their conduct is not the
outcome of any perversity. The appellants have not asserted the beliefs for the
first time or out of any unpatriotic sentiments. Their objection to sing is not
just against the National Anthem of India. They have refused to sing other
National Anthems elsewhere. They are law abiding and well-behaved children, who
do stand respectfully and would continue to do so, when National Anthem is
sung. Their refusal, while so standing to join in the singing of the National
Anthem is neither disrespectful of it, nor inconsistent with the Fundamental
Duty under Article 51 A (a). Hence no action should have been taken against
them.
F.
Because the concept of sovereignty was present
from the ancient time but the sovereignty was conferred upon an individual who
is suppress the wicked and is recognized as great resources in itself like the
god of fire, air, sun, moon and religion. The religion in the ancient time was
considered as spiritualism and it was not dependent upon any ritual ceremony,
but it was considered s the knowledge in the darkness of ignorance and
injustice. The sovereignty was supposed to promote the cause of the religion,
wealth and enjoyment of life and those, who were voluptuous, malicious, mean,
and low-minded, were ruined by the retributive justice.
G.
Because the apex court held in RamSharan
Autyanuprasi’s case 1989 (Supp.) (1) SCC 251/AIR 1989 S.C 549 , that men’s life
is inclusive of his tradition , culture and heritage and protection of that
heritage in its full measure would certainly come within the encompass of an
expanded concept of Article 21 of the Constitution
H.
Because the mankind must be satisfied with the
reasonableness within reach and the decision-making process may belong to the
knowledge of the law. Thus the reasonableness and the rationality, legality, as
well as philosophically, provide colour to the meaning of fundamental right
.The concept of equality is not doctrinaire approach. It is a binding threat, which
runs through the entire constitutional text thus the affirmative action may be
constitutionally valid and the same cannot ignore the constitutional morality,
which embraces in-itself the doctrine of inequality. It would be
constitutionally immoral to perpetuate inequality among majority .The
constitution is required to kept young energetic and alive. The attempt be
endure to expand the ambit of fundamental right. It is said that the dignity of
the ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing destruction, but in its vast
extent and depth with enormous tolerance. Thus the wider the power, the higher
the need of caution and care while exercising the power.
I.
Because the Student/children, the future
citizens under taking the education of Indian History on the misconception/
pattern of Anglo Saxon teaching meant for division of Indian society on the
policy of “Divide and Rule”. There is a important question posed as to whether
we have actually gain our independence or we have to under take another journey
full of animosity, aggressism on account of terrorism and fanatic ideology a
prevalent throughout the World of a particular religion.
J.
Because this writ petition is moved in the
Public Interest, for a National Cause, to establish the truth there is no
private interest or any other oblique motive, or any other personal gain. The
petitioner institution, known as Institute for Re-writing Indian History,
Thane, having registration no.F-1128 (T) is a public trust. The founder
president of the trust is Shri P.N. Oak S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/o-
Plot no. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune.411007, who has written number of
books namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some
Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic
Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a
Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is
Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to
Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian
History.
K.
Because the petitioner No. 2 is the founder
President of an Institution, namely, “ Institute for Re-writing Indian (and
World) History “. The aim and objective of that institution, which is a registered
society having register no. F-1128 (T) as the public trust under the provision
of Bombay Public Trust Act. Inter alia, is to re-discover the Indian history.
The monumental places of historical importance in their real and true
perspective having of the heritage of India.
L.
Because the
‘ research paper’ of the author on the subject that the so-called “Taj Mahal “ is not a monument built by an
Invader Emperor in memory of his late wife but a Hindu Shiva Temple which was
converted into a love-memorial by a Invader Emperor.
M.
Because the freedom of speech and expression is
basic to indivisible from a democratic polity .It includes right to impart and
receive information. Restriction to the said right could be only as provided in
article 19(2). The old dictum let the people have the truth and the freedom to
discuss it and all will go well with the Government. It should prevail. The
true test for deciding the validity is whether it takes away or abridges
fundamental right of the citizens. If there were direct abridgement of the
fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law would be
invalid.
N.
the ambit and scope of “Right to Know “ is
conferred fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(a),25 and26 read with Article
49 and 51-A(f) (h) of the Constitution of India; read with the provision of
Freedom of Information Act, 2002 .The right to get information in democracy is
recognized all throughout and it is a natural right flowing from the concept of
democracy itself. Freedom of expression may be necessarily included in the
right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea on the
subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be given effect to
change the existing values of ideology, which are based on the notable extracts
of certain facts. An enlightening informed citizen would undoubtedly enhance
democratic values.
O.
Because the Governor
General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived
indigenous scheme of misusing the archaeological studies. This young Cunnigham,
an army engineer had no training in the archaeological department, he wrote a
lengthy letter dated September 15, 1842 suggesting archeological exploration in
India. This letter is reproduced on page no 246 Volume 7 journal of Royal Asiatic
Society, London, and 1843 A.D. It discloses that the purpose of archeological
exploration in India is neither the study; nor preservation of historical
monuments, but to use archeology as the imperial tool to create mutual
dissension and resentment between Buddhists, Jains and other Hindu with
Invaders by falsely crediting all monuments to the authorship to alien invaders
while few may be labeled as that of being constructed by Buddhist or Jain, but
not by Hindus.
P.
Because it
has been disclosed during the High level Committee Meeting at Paris during the
convention of United Nation Education Science and Cultural Organisation
(UNESCO) that near Anoop Talab (Pond), there has been the ancient palatial
building and the ancient cultural activities remain in existance prior to the
period of invasion by the Mughal invaders. The historian have related them back
to the existence of all such palatial building during the period of Sikarwar,
Rajput, which find support by the research were conducted Prof. Ram Nathan historian
of Rajasthan University, Jaipur and also by Dr. Pratima Asthana, Ex Vice
Chancellor of Gorakhpur University.
Q.
Because one great tragedy of Indian history has
been that while Indians remained subdued and gagged under alien domination for
over a millenium foreigners, who wielded all power in India played great havoc
with Indian history merrily destroying or distorting it at their sweetwill
either out of sheer cunning and cussedness or through their colossal ignorance
and wanton barbarism.
R.
Because that life includes all the meaning given
to a man’s life including his tradition, culture and hertiage and protection of
that heritage in its full measure squarely comes within the encompass of the
extended concept of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
S.
Because that the Taj Mahal, is a mark of history
of hertiage and the glorious achievement of Indian Art and Archaeology, and has
to be named and recognised in its true perspective and origin as a monument of
world important must not be allowed to be the victim subject of an “Historical
fraud” as an infringement of Indian tradition and heritage if the said monument
is wrongly and falsely indentifing and reconized as a mausoleum giving a go bye
to its origin and actual creation as a Palace/Temple in redemption of fact and
restoration of history.
T.
Because the history of one’s heritage has to be
rewritten to give a true and correct account of the facts and figures,
achievements and failures, conquest end the defeat.as the Taj Mahal was not
built by the fifth generation Mugal emperor, namely, Shahjahan which is
evidently proved.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, MOST
RESPECTFULLY, prayed that this Hon’ble Court May graciously be pleased
to
1.
Issue a Writ,
order, direction in the nature of mandamus by appointing a facts finding committee
for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department regarding the
historical blunder committed by them in respect of their purported claim set-up
in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other ancient
Hindu buildings/ monuments as Muslim monuments and restrain them from
displaying the authorship of these buildings as constructed by Sahajahan or by
any mughal Invaders as truth may be disclosed to the public/citizens and
Students in Subject of History regarding their true authorship prior to Mughal
period in furtherance of their
fundamental rights conferred to the Citizens under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and
26 read with49 and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of
Information Act, 2002.
2.
Issue a writ,
order, direction in the nature of mandamus
declaring the provisions of The
Ancient And Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains
(Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the
ancient and historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj
Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford , Ethmadualla and other Monuments as
built by Mugal invaders on the basis of report submitted by Then Governor
General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived
indigenous scheme of “Divide and Rule”
and thereby misusing the archaeological studies, as ultravires to
Article 19 (1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h)constitution of India and this
Hon’ble Court may futher declare the
provision of Ancient and Historical
Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National
Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological
Sites And Remains Act, 1958 of declaring
these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such false identity with out
any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Muslim monuments /
graveyards as unconstitutional and void.
3.
Issue a writ,
order, direction in the nature of mandamus on the basis of the Research
Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books written
by him as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The
Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4.
Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World
History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land,
9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great,
11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc
in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D.
B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the truth may be exposed through
Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/ Students of history by
conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu monuments by the
Central Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/ temple and other
ancient archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like demolition of
disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass destruction
of the public property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law in the
society.
4. Issue a
writ, order, directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry
report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India may
Declare and Notify in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built
by Shahajahan and thereby directing the Archaeological Survey of India to
remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting
Shahjahan as its creator and to futher
desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming / propagating and teaching about
Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop and discontinue the free entry
in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays in the
week.
5. Issue a writ, order, direction in
the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities in particular
Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper and lower portions
of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal having numbers of rooms, 2)-to remove
all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein, 3)-to investigate
scientifically and certify that which of
those or both cenotaphs are fake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the
river bank ground level, 5)-to look into after removing the room-entrance
directly beneath the basement cenotaph-chamber.6)- by removing the brick and
lime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to look for important historical
evidence such as idols and inscriptions hidden inside there by the Shahjahan’s orders as truth may not make us
rich but the same will make us free from superstitions and false propoganda of
some of fundamentalists.
6. Any other Writ , Order or Direction,
Which this Hon’ble Court May deem fit in the circumstances of the case
Dated-7th September
,2004 Yogesh
Kumar Saxena
Advocate, High Court
(Counsel for the Petitioner)
Chamber No.139, High court, Allahabad
No comments:
Post a Comment