IN THE HON’BLE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.
(Under Article 226 of
constitution of India)
Annexure No.
Civil Misc. Writ Petition
No. of 2004
(District – Agra)
Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
Aundh, Pune – 411007 and
another…………..Pettioners
VERSUS
Union of India through
Secretary,
Human Resources
and Development (HRD),
Government of
India, New Delhi. ……………….Respondents
Details in
respect of the Hindu Identity of
Different Buildings/Monuments
Agra the Taj Mahal
That this symphony in marble was
a royal Hindu palace. Its very name Taj Mahal signifies nothing more or less.
Its octagonal shape and the cupolas and four towers at the plinth corners are
all Hindu features. Havell, the English architect has all along stressed that
the Taj is an entirely Hindu structure in design and execution. The four towers
used to sport multi-coloured lights. The Taj precincts are a huge building
complex encompassing over three hundred rooms. The locality was known as
Jaisinghpur. This ornate marble trelliswork entirely in the Hindu style now
encloses tow tombs believed to be those of Mumtaz and Shahjahan .The network
was stuffed with rare gems. Traditional accounts tell us that this enclosure
had silver doors and gold railings to boot. Even Shahjahan’s and Mumtaz’s
palaces never boasted of such fabulous fixtures when the pair was alive and
kicking from the imperial throne. How come then that when Mumtaz died (1630
A.D.) all this wealth descended on earth all of a sudden. Far from that this
expensive and resplendent enclosure was made to house the dazzling Hindu
peacock throne that throne, wrongly credited to Shahjahan, came to his
possession when he dispossessed the Taj Mahal’s last Rajput owner Jai Singh of
this fabulous ancient Hindu palace.
The Marble Screen at the Taj -The Gateway of Taj
That the gateway leading to the
Taj garden is like any other Hindu gateway tallying in every detail with those
of other forts and palaces depicted. The tiny domes over these gateways in a
row invariably make an odd figure like 5,7,9, or 11,since in Hindu tradition
the odd figure is preferred to the even. For instance donors give away
101,501,1001 rupees but never an even figure.
That Jahangir’s son Shahjahan is said to have
demolished 500 buildings inside the fort and erected 500 others. On the very
face of it this claim is absurd. No one will merely for fun of it destroy 500
palatial mansions built by one’s father or grandfather. Such demolition itself
will occupy a lifetime. Moreover it must also be remembered that Shahjahan is
credited with building the fabulous Taj Mahal in Agra, a whole new township of
Delhi, also the Red fort in Delhi, The Jama Masjid in Delhi and perhaps many
other buildings. Not only are there no court records of any building activity
but even inscriptions do not substantiate any building claim. We wish to alert
visitors not to be misled by the appearance of Arabic or Persian lettering on
mediaeval buildings. All such lettering is mostly of Koranic extracts or the
name of Allah. Those inscriptions are seldom temporal. In a few instances where
there are temporal inscriptions they usually bear the name of the engraver or
of the person buried and some irrelevant matter. For instance nowhere on the
Taj Mahal has it been mentioned that the Taj Mahal was built by Shahjahan.We
therefore wonder how the whole world had been duped for 300 long years into
believing that the Taj Mahal was built by Shahjahan. Similar is the case with
Red fort in Agra. No where is it said that Akbar or his son Jahangir or the
latter’s son Shahjahan built anything there.
Delhi Gate, Agra Fort, Anguri
Bagh, Agra fort
That this gateway of the Red Fort
Agra is entirely in the traditional Rajput styles. Like many other Rajput forts
this too had elephant images flanking it. Emperors Kanishka and Ashok made use
of this fort in the pre-Christian era. All its interior apartments too are of
the exclusive Rajput variety. The version which ascribes authorship of this
fort to Akbar, is a piece of court flattery. All its gateways have Hindu names.
In addition to elephant images this fort had images of Rajput horses. The
Anguri bagh pavilion inside Agra fort proves that the geometrical pattern
garden has Rajput origins. Note the arches, the pillars, the brackets, the
cupola at the right, the curved ceiling partly visible adjoining the cupola,
which are all Rajput characteristics.
Golden Pavilion, Agra fort
That the cupola in the top
left-hand corner, the curved roof, and the spikes on it vividly depicts that
this Golden Pavilion in Agra’s Red Fort was built by the Rajputs for the
Rajputs.
Diwan-I-Aam, Agra fort
That the so-called Diwan-I-Aam or
hall of public audience inside Agar fort has neither domes nor minarets. Its
graceful arches and slender pillars is still the pattern for Hindu pandals
raised for auspicious ceremonies. Invader tradition has always avoided such
Hindu, ‘infidel’ patterns. Theirs are grotesque, tortuous shapes. The Red Fort
in Delhi too has an identical pavilion.
Statue of Akbar’s Horse
That this replica believed to be
of Akbar’s horse is in fact an earlier Rajput horse. Akbar, a Invader ordered
no statues. Rajputs were known to erect elephant and horse statues. Those slyly
attributing the construction of Agra Fort to Akbar had Willy nilly also to
thrust upon him the erection of ‘infidel’ statues.
Statue of Amar Singh’s Horse Outside Agra Fort
That this horse head belongs to
pre Invader times. It commemorates a brave steed. There were ever so many Amar
Singhs in Rajput history. The invented story that this replica is Moghul
wrought and is of the horse on which Amar Singh galloped away in a huff from
the Moghul court takes for granted that the lay visitor has hardly the time or
the necessary grounding in history to debunk such canards.
Tomb of Sadiq Khan
That this truncated corner tower
cum-bastion of a demolished Rajput palace standing in splendid isolation was
later used to shelter Sadiq Khan’s corpse. That should not, however blind
visitors to the fact that this monument was part of a Rajput palace. Its
niches, the arched entrances and the upper floor all show that it was meant to
be a place for the living.
Jahangiri Mahal, Agra fort
That the entrance to the
so-called Jahangiri Mahal inside Agra fort is of the typical Rajput design and
workmanship. Usurpation and centuries of occupation resulted in Moghul names
being given to earlier captured Rajput buildings. Gullible Western Scholarsm
lacking indigenous insight perpetuated the myth of Invader authorship of
buildings misled by their names and latest associations. They hardly cared
whether a building was attributed to a Fakirchand or a Fakir Mohammad.
Jama Masjid, Agra
That all so called mediaeval Jama
Masjids in India were earlier main (Jama) temples of the town. This so-called
Jama Masjid in the centre of Agra was a Rajput citadel with ladies apartments
and an underground passage to the fort. It has a huge basement too. The
inscription crediting its construction to Jahanara Begum is an interpolation.
Jahanara an unmarried lady who spent her sorrowing life in the smothering
confines of the Invaders purdah nursing her imprisoned and deposed father
Shahjahan, had hardly any money left with her. Even for two square meals a day
she was at the mercy of her wily and hardhearted brother Aurangzeb.
Salim Chisti Tomb, Fatehpur Sikri
That this so-called Salim Chisti
tomb in Fatehpur Sikri is clearly an ornate Rajput temple. Note the two round
stone flower emblems on either side of the arch, and the curving brackets. In
the right background is the typical Rajput gateway capped by cupolas. The lotus
shaped fountain base in the foreground tank is also reminiscent of Rajput
ownership. This ornamental pillar Pillar supporting Akbar’s Throne in
Diwan-I-Khas with a narrow circular perch on top approached by four stone-slab
bridges in Fatehpur Sikri could as well have been a royal Rajput bathroom while
concocted Akbar legends claim it to be a throne room. But throne rooms in
Akbar’s time were not as tiny as a Pigeon house.
Hiran Minar, Fatehpur Sikri
That this so called Hiran Minar
infront of the Hathi Pol gate of Fatehpur Sikri is falsely claimed to mark the
burial of a pet deer (Hiran) of Akbar .We ask whether the deer had whispered a
dying wish in Akbar’s ear to be commemorated with a fat Hindu temple lamp post?
The bristles were used to support oil lamps Such pillars are common infront of
Hindu Temples and palaces. The spiraling staircase inside leading to the cupola
on top remins one of the so called Kutub Minar in Delhi which have proved to be
of Hindu origin. This tower was known as ‘Hiranmaya’ since it sparkled like
gold when it bristled with flames of hundreds of lamps hung on it. That
Sanskrit word has been deftly twisted to be stuffed into the concocted Akbar
legend.
Buland Darwaza, Fatehpur Sikri
That this towering gateway in
Fatehpur Sikri is currently known to us as Buland Darwaza.It is a typical
Rajput Township. The stone flower emblems flanking the arch are an unmistakable
sign of its Hindu origin. The three big cupolas and the 13 tiny ones in front
in a row on the terrace front are of the exclusive Rajput design. The slender
pillars spiked at the top were used for hoisting flags. Such pillars are a part
of almost all-mediaeval Rajput monuments. The stone flower emblems are
invariably present on all Hindu homes and temples of the orthodox design, while
they never exist on genuine mosques.
Itmad-ud-Daulah’s Tomb
That this interior mural
decoration in the so called Itmad-ud-Daulah tomb ,Agra is no different from
that found the pre-Invader Ambar palace
in Jaipur,which proves that the building was an earlier Rajput palace.
So-called Akbar’s Mausoleum at
Sikandra
That every arch, supporting
brackets and capping cupola of this mansion consisting of pile upon pile of
pavilions proves to the hilt that it was a Rajput palace. Euphemistically
called Sikandra ever since Sikandar Lodi a Pathan ruler lived in it, this
mansion six miles to the north of Agra is known to posterity as Akbar’s tomb.
Akbar lay ill and died here.
Gateway Sikandra
That this is the majestic gateway
to Sikandra Palace. The mansion inside was turned into a tomb after Akbar’s
death. It was built by the Rajputs centuries before Invader invaders launched
on a career of vandalism and usurpation. The four towers rising above the
gateway are replicas of the Taj Mahal towers. The mosaic flooring of the
mansion has the esoteric Hindu Shakti-Chakra (interlocked triangles) inlaid in
it by the dozen. Invader funeral rites admit of no such design.
Salabat Khan’s Mausoleum, Agra
That this Salabat Khan’s
mausoleum is a truncated Rajput pavilion allotted to Khan for his residence. On
his death he was buried there.
Ganesh Pol Ambar Palace, Jaipur
That it was built around 984
A.D.,it had obviously no Invader influence. The gates of all extant mediaeval
monuments in India are similar to the Ganesh Pol. Gates of Mosques and tombs in
west Asian countries are also of identical design. This proves that far from
Indian mediaeval monuments having being designed or ordered by Invader
potentates and craftsmen, it was West Asian monuments, which were designed and
executed by Indian technicians as recorded by Mohammed Ghazni and Taimurlang.
That incidentally it may also be pointed out that the recorded fact of Mohammed
Ghazni having been buried in his own palace in Ghazni (1030 A.D.) also proves
that all so called Invader tombs whether in India or in West Asian countries
are usurped palaces which they occupied during their life times. That this
Shish Mahal inside the Ambar fortress in Jaipur was built (about 984. A.D.)
Centuries before the founding of Invader Kingdoms in India. Its ornate inlay
work is no different from that in what are believed to be mediaeval Invader
mosques and tombs. It proves two things; firstly that the so-called tombs and
mosques were of Rajput origin and secondly that they were intended for the
living not for the dead.
Palace Garden Ambar
That this pavilion and the garden
in the Ambar Palace with its spiked and curved roof, the graceful Hindu arch
and the geometrical design in the foreground is typical of all mediaeval
buildings. Ambar which lies three miles away from modern Jaipur, was founded
not later than 984 A.D. That was much before alien Invaders established their
principalities in India.
Thatreaders not acquainted with
legal procedure might then ask as to whether there is any documentary evidence
available to prove that the fort was built by the Hindus in the pre-christian
era. The answer to this is that the immense Hindu evidence that existed in the
form of Hindu idols, inscriptions and documents in the archives of ancient
Hindu kings was all looted and destroyed when Mohammad Ghazni first raided the
red fort in the early part of the 11th century and again when the
fort remained under continued Invader occupation from 1526 to about 1760 A.D. If the owner of a building is
forced out of his mansion and the aggressor remains in occupation for several
centuries will the owner find his record intact on obtaining possession of his
mansion after several centuries?
Iron Pillar near the Qutub Tower
That the iron pillar bearing a
Hindu inscription has been standing un-rusted through rain and shine for
milleniums beside the so–called Qutub Minar amidst the surrounding temples
battered by Invader hordes. Qutubuddin could never have brought piles of
material and dug a sprawling foundation for the stone tower called (Qutub)
inside the narrow confines of surrounding temples and other building work.
Dislodged stones bearing Hindu images on one side and Arab lettering on the
other found the so called Qutub Tower also prove that Invader conquerors staked
false claim to Hindu monuments through sculptural forgeries.
Qutub Minar
That this 238 ft. tall tower
euphemistically called Kutub Minar was erected by King Vikramaditya for
astronomical observation centuries before Islam was even founded. The adjoining
township called Mehrauli is the corrupt form the Sanskrit term Mihira-Awali
meaning the Mihira Township. Mihira was Vikramaditya’s royal
mathematician-cum-astronomer-cum meteorologist. Even the Arabic term Kutub
Minar signifies an astronomical tower. Kutub and Kutubuddin was a subsequent
unwitting mix-up. Around the tower were 27 constellation temples which
Kutubuddin’s inscription vaunts to have destroyed. The tower too has 27
flutings. Near the first storey ceiling are 27 holes one in each is likely.
True to the significance of the term Kutub, this Tower’s entrance faces due
north.
Quwat-ul-Islam Mosque
That turned into a mosque called
Quwat-ul-Islam the rows of ornamental pillars of this monument by the side of
the so-called Qutub Tower are a clear proof of its having been a Hindu temple.
No genuine mosque has ever such pillars lest reciters of Namaz standing and
bending with half-closed eyes inadvertently break their heads against them.
Nizam-ud-din Tomb
That the ornamental Hindu style
pillars in the white marble structure turned into Nizamuddin Tomb. The arch on
the right and parts of arches visible on either side of the dome are clear
proof that this haphazard conglomerate of heterogeneous buildings was a part of
an ancient Hindu township stormed by invading Invader armies. Fakirs like Nizamuddin
following in their wake used to take up residence in the ruins of battered
buildings for preaching Islam to terrorize ‘infidels’. On their death they used
to be buried in the ruins where they lived. That is why tombs like those of
Nizamuddin and Bakhtiar Kaki in Delhi, Salim Chisti in Fatehpur Sikri and of
Moinuddin Chisti in Ajmer present a mix-up of Hindu structure devoid of any
coherent plan. Around the Nizamuddin tomb in Delhi are fanciful halls called Chausath Khamba, crumbling walls,
bastions, towers, decadent graves, cellars ,plinths and cornices which are
remnants of the stormed Hindu township still remembered by the term
Keel-Ukhri(Kilokri). Keel used to be the central pillar erected when a Hindu
township was planned. Since it got up-rooted in the Invader assault that area
came to be known as Kilokri.
So called Humayun’s Tomb
That just about half a mile away
from this building known as Humayun Tomb is the narrow staircase from which
Humayun the second generation Moghul emperor fell, in Delhi. He was carried to
his palace say contemporary chronicles. This was the palace he was carried to
and it was there that he died a few days later. He was buried in the central
chamber where he lay ill as has happened throughout Invader history in India.
This solves the tantalizing riddle why we have tombs but apparently no palaces
of luxury-steeped pleasure-seeking alien potentates. This monument still forms
part of Jaipur Estate in Delhi. It is surrounded by ruined walls, annexes,
guesthouses, and guardrooms. An arcade of arches leads to it. Close-by is a
huge annexes euphemistically called Arab-ki-Serai deriving its name from the
times that invading Arab hordes encamped in it .The entire grounds are littered
with graves of invading Invader soldiers slain by Hindu defenders. Before being
turned into a tomb Humayun as a usurper lived in this sprawling Hindu captured
palace which was the focal point of the ruined township since known as Kilokri.
The nearby ruins in which Fakir Nizamuddin lies buried were a part of this huge
Hindu citadel.
Roshanara Garden
That this is believed to be the
tomb of Roshanara, the daughter of the last powerful Moghul emperor Aurangzeb.
Note that it has neither domes nor minarets. Instead it has ornamental pillars,
Hindu arches and cupolas. Very parsimonious and hardhearted as the Hindu-baiter
Aurangzeb was he would hardly spend any money on a Hindu style resting-place
for his daughter’s corpse. Obviously, therefore, this is a usurped Hindu garden
palace commandeered to serve as a tomb as was usual in those times.
Fatehpuri Mosque
That this so called Fatehpuri
Mosque at one end of Delhi’s crowded Chandni Chowk highway was a pre-Invader
Rajput temple of the city’s guardian and royal deity Lord Shankara alias
Eklingaji. Its entrance arches have the Hindu stone flower emblems on either
side of the apex. The word ‘Fatehpuri’ means a conquered (Hindu) township. The
marble slab on the red-stone entrance proclaiming it to be a mosque is
evidently as interpolation. The monuments, arches and pillars and cupolas are
entirely of Hindu Rajput style. The so-called mosque’s rental revenue is all
derived exclusively from Hindu shops swarming its fringes. This proves that
while the stalls remained with the Hindu their temples fell a victim to
conquest and conversion.
Mausoleum of Safdar Jang
That this so called Safdarjang
tomb in Delhi was an ancient Rajput palace which devolved on the Invader
aristocracy through conquest .It has an ornamental Rajput style gateway and a
protective wall with watch-towers and bastions which are superfluous for a
genuine tomb. Safdarjang, an ex-chief Minister of the Nawab of Oudh had been
disgraced and dismissed prior to his death. Who would foot the bill to build a
palace for an unemployed deceased nobleman’s corpse? A little prodding with two
sharp questions brings down the entire illusory structure of tall Invader
claims to Hindu building-work. We ask that if Safdarjang’s corpse could afford
such a stupendous palace he should have had at least ten palaces when living.
But there is none. The other question is that if his heir and successor built
this palace for the corpse of the deceased Safdarjang the former must himself
have had tens of palaces in Delhi. But
he too had none. Our answer to this riddle is that Safdarjang and in fact all
alien Invader rulers and noblemen were buried in their own palaces.
Diwan-I-Khas, Red Fort, Delhi
That contrary to popular belief
the Red Fort in Delhi is a very ancient structure. Prithviraj used to stay in
this Lalkot (red palace). Saffron and ochre are colours sacred to the Hindus,
but avoided by Invaders The main highway of Delhi known as Chandni Chowk
connects the Red Fort with the royal and guardian deity’ temple now turned into
Fatehpuri Mosque. Around this axis was built Old Delhi protected by a massive
wall. According to Akbarnama and the Agni Purana, Delhi was built by the Hindu
King Anagpal around 372 A.D. before founding of Islam.
Imambadas in Lucknow
The so called Imambadas in Lucknow for instance are ancient Hindu
places which are being merrily ascribed to this or that alien Invader nawab who
subjugated that part of Hindusthan.
No comments:
Post a Comment